FOH'ers Daily Smoke


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • LLC

    1962

  • Raskol

    1889

  • Lotusguy

    1775

  • havanaclub

    1426

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

An RE Friday with @Nate Chu C&C for a Saturday morning with this Sir Winston from 03. Today is going to be great if this cigar is anything to judge it by. What a super smooth star

First cigar of the year.

C&C ‘14 especiales. Fantastic start to the day C&C with a Monte 4 C&C time today with a Perla picked up from 24:24

14 minutes ago, Jerryvonkramer said:

Bolivar Royal Corona. I have to admit I just don’t get Bolivar. Everyone says they are rich but I get very little but a bit of wood and vanilla. Many swear by these but I don’t get it at all. Whole lot of nothing. 73.

I also have little time for the BRC, but I love Bolivar. Have you had any BBF's?  Libertadors? Tubos 1/3, coronas junior?

I have found the BRC to be the weakest in the line. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, 99call said:

I also have little time for the BRC, but I love Bolivar. Have you had any BBF's?  Libertadors? Tubos 1/3, coronas junior?

I have found the BRC to be the weakest in the line. 

Have had the BBF. For what it’s worth. Here’s my review: 
 

Bolivar Belicosos Fino. V good construction, draw a bit tight. Bolivars have this flaky ash but look how it holds! No-nonsense “manly” Cuban, leather, cocoa, savoury spicy. Rich plumes of aromatic smoke. Lacks that “deep salt” I look for. Samey. Not for beginners. 87.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jerryvonkramer said:

Montecristo Especial No 2. Lighter than the No 1 and less coffee than typical Monty profile. Slight chocolate but the dominant note I got was coconut almost like a Bounty. I like the vitola but worth paying extra for the No 1 in my view. 87.

In my opinion, these need time (5+ years) to realize their potential (and added years simply add to their wonderful potential for delicious complexity).  To each his own; just wanted to offer that for possible future enjoyment.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Glass Half Full said:

In my opinion, these need time (5+ years) to realize their potential (and added years simply add to their wonderful potential for delicious complexity).  To each his own; just wanted to offer that for possible future enjoyment.

If I ever see a box for a reasonable price maybe but what do they have over the No 1? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.