Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, djrey said:

How do you find the Royale compare to the PC. I really enjoy the Royales but as the price creeps up on them I have debated replacing with the PC or the Mille Fleur. 

These PCs are 2007s from a 5x5 cardboard pack. A bit flavour less and when I got them maybe even tasted of cardboard (I've taken them out and not storing in cardboard anymore). Construction is very good though which has been my experience with the few singles I've had previously.

MF is good. I think closer in flavour to the Royales. I've seen the Royales on sale at at least one vendor recently not too far from MF prices. Prices are all over the map on the Royales.

  • Like 1
  • Replies 91.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • LLC

    1964

  • Raskol

    1902

  • Lotusguy

    1775

  • havanaclub

    1445

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

An RE Friday with @Nate Chu C&C for a Saturday morning with this Sir Winston from 03. Today is going to be great if this cigar is anything to judge it by. What a super smooth star

First cigar of the year.

C&C ‘14 especiales. Fantastic start to the day C&C with a Monte 4 C&C time today with a Perla picked up from 24:24

Posted

Damn he made no comment


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Most not have been good. Lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Haha 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Gamehawker said:

What a gorgeous wrapper on that H.Upmann No.2.

What was the box code?

It was from a quarter box from 24:24, I believe the box code was GEM ABR 20.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, yadegari6 said:

How did it smoke? I just received a GEM ABR 20 box that have some dark wrappers. 

This was the second one I smoked from the quarter box, and the second one I've ever smoked too. First one had coffee and leather, rather than the standard Upmann coffee and shortbread. The second one I may have overdone it on cigars before getting to, but coffee again and some twang (some other flavours I've forgotten). Pleasant enough but I'll have to smoke one or two more before I can say for sure.

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Bijan said:

This was the second one I smoked from the quarter box, and the second one I've ever smoked too. First one had coffee and leather, rather than the standard Upmann coffee and shortbread. The second one I may have overdone it on cigars before getting to, but coffee again and some twang (some other flavours I've forgotten). Pleasant enough but I'll have to smoke one or two more before I can say for sure.

I don’t believe I’ve ever had one, looking forward to giving these a shot after some rest. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Kaptain Karl said:
Monte 2 last night and HU2 today.


Which was better ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Kaptain Karl said:

Monte 2 last night and HU2 today. 

4444893C-3604-42FA-A964-783B81B26134.jpeg

0C3BD19F-60CA-4B49-9B06-06CECE9032CC.jpeg

Nice looking wrapper on these cigars.

I prefer the golden wrapper on my H. Upmann No. 2 like the one that you are smoking.

I have heard that the darker wrapper on the Montecristo No. 2 is better than a lighter wrapper.

Which of these pyramids did you enjoy more?

And do you know the box code of each?

Thanks

Posted
1 hour ago, Kaptain Karl said:

Monte 2 last night and HU2 today. 

I’m loving both of those nowadays. Got 1 box of 2015 montes that are perfect right now and I love the newer HU 2s

  • Like 4
Posted
6 minutes ago, havanaclub said:


Which one was better


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Havanaclub,

He answered this question for me and lovethehaze on your prior post. See prior posts above your post to answer your question. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.