FOH'ers Daily Smoke


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • LLC

    1963

  • Raskol

    1891

  • Lotusguy

    1775

  • havanaclub

    1429

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

An RE Friday with @Nate Chu C&C for a Saturday morning with this Sir Winston from 03. Today is going to be great if this cigar is anything to judge it by. What a super smooth star

First cigar of the year.

C&C ‘14 especiales. Fantastic start to the day C&C with a Monte 4 C&C time today with a Perla picked up from 24:24

On 21.2.2018 at 2:44 AM, noreaster said:

Y2K Clasicos...meh...feel like past their prime...last couple I had were like this...shoulda polished off the box a while ago...

20180220_204021.jpg

Sorry to hear - storage perhaps...(?) My '01 stash is smoking better than ever. A 2006 box, on the other hand, found a few years back, appears to be over the hill (still nice smokes though). But the Y2K tobacco - 1999-01, the ones I smoked from the 'dreaded' period - seems to have legs.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2018 at 4:50 PM, 99call said:

This is very worrying, I have nothing against NC cigars, but if ever proved, I would be super pissed off.  

99 luckily that NC pepper taste goes away almost immediately. I doubt it contains any NC but the first few puffs certainly had that taste. I’m curious to see if they all have that taste. So far I’ve only smoked one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Fugu said:

Sorry to hear - storage perhaps...(?) My '01 stash is smoking better than ever. A 2006 box, on the other hand, found a few years back appears to be over the hill (still nice smokes though). But the Y2K tobacco - 1999-01, the ones I smoked from the 'dreaded' period - seems to have legs.

Found this and another box at a Mexican LCDH about 5 yrs ago...1st box was superb..no idea why this box has let me down. Going to chalk it up as typical Cuban inconsistencies ...

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, noreaster said:

Going to chalk it up as typical Cuban inconsistencies ...

Sure, may be. But over those periods of time, storage and provenance come to play an increasingly important role. In my humble opinion, the Clasicos (basically speaking, leaving outliers aside) is one of those cigars that has the legs to become a true classic and will still be great for decades down the road.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.