Colt45 Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 Another cigar from a batch sent to me from a very generous member of the board. Construction: Felt just a tad heavy for it's size. Foot and clipped head looked rather tightly bunched. Firm with just a slight give along it's length, giving me reason to believe there would be no construction issues. Wrapper: Light colorado with a slight green tinge. Leathery to the touch with some tooth. Moderate veining. No oil to speak of - not the prettiest cigar, but nor is it ugly. Pre Light Draw / Aroma: Aroma of sweet hay. Draw on the firm side, but does draw over it's length. A light taste of tobacco. Draw / Burn: Draw on the firm side but in no way poor, with great smoke volume. Burn is straight overall, but does go off center from time to time. Taste: First puffs - I'm blind sided - full, deep, rich, earthy. I don't know what I was expecting, but this took me by surprise. Nearly an inch in, it throttles back to a medium body. From here I can only give an overall impression - it was complex and did meander. Some stewed fruit. A doughy creaminess on the front palate. Hints of sugar sweetness. For the duration, a core of earthy tobacco. Intensity and combinations of flavors swelled and subsided. From the beginning, a dry cedary finish which was tannic, but smoothly so. This attribute never changed. Smooth. Balanced. Integrated. The rare cigar that holds your attention for it's length, but that you don't have to really think about - great from the start. At the band, it starts to become green and sharp, but I smoke on - I'm too enamored to care. I'm rewarded with a few last hits of sweetness, but the green quality wins out in the end, and I set it down with an inch to go. A solid 90, which includes slight deductions for appearance, draw, and the green ending. My gut feeling is that it has the stuffing to age and evolve for years. Comments: In my opinion, this is a cigar for real cigar smokers - those to whom flavor is paramount, and who are not concerned with appearances. Posers need not apply. For members who have not tried some of the available thinner ring Havanas, or who might not believe these thin ring cigars can deliver flavor and complexity, I think you should think about giving some of these cigars a shot. As esteemed member Tampa might say, thin is in! I'm thankful for the opportunity, but cursing at the same time - I now have another cigar to add to the short list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trumpetchris Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 I have a couple from 01. They are fantastic. Good review. thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWeb Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 I also have some 00's sitting in the humi. I've been holding off smoking them but reading this review is making me reconsider. I hope mine as a good as yours sound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokum Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 Great review Colt...I smoked one from OSU/OCT00 last week. It was a very complex and excellent smoke. I have smoked 3 from this 10 box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CIGARHead Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 Very nice review Ross. I have not smoked the No. 1, but have a love affair with the #2. The LGC line is wayyyy underrated and I just knew there was a cigar I forgot to order on my last....maybe next time?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Presidente Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 Nice one Ross I find that with 5 years of age orange peel becomes the hallmark of the LGC MO1. It appears that your example may have had a few years lef to go in its evolution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaltPointer Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 Great review, Ross. I have some La Gloria Cubana Medaille d'Or No. 2 singles with box code OSU MAR 02 that I picked up from the Czar, and I'm planning on smoking them as soon as they've had some recovery time in the humi. (The 2's are a Dalias vitola, which I became interested in after enjoying a Party 8-9-8 a few weeks back. But I digress . . . ) Your review makes me very eager and curious to try this marque. Thanks for posting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Twain Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 Great review, a cigar that is deserving of more attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmokinAl Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 Good job mate. I haven't given LGC's a look in ages, but you've inspired me to re-think it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now