Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks for the read KG. Interesting re the cigar - it seems to be one of those that is hit or miss for members - for me a miss. The '06s (my box anyway) showed real flashes, but suffered from overly tight draws and fragile wrappers. The '07s (again, my box) had better construction, but were rather dull. I still have quite a few of those so will have to re-visit once I get some decent weather.

I think you know my thoughts on the red wine pairing. One of my locals shows the 2012 Caley - for $400 - so I won't be trying it any time soon, but I am intrigued...

Posted
12 hours ago, Colt45 said:

Thanks for the read KG. Interesting re the cigar - it seems to be one of those that is hit or miss for members - for me a miss. The '06s (my box anyway) showed real flashes, but suffered from overly tight draws and fragile wrappers. The '07s (again, my box) had better construction, but were rather dull. I still have quite a few of those so will have to re-visit once I get some decent weather.

I think you know my thoughts on the red wine pairing. One of my locals shows the 2012 Caley - for $400 - so I won't be trying it any time soon, but I am intrigued...

morning colt. hope the 07s step up for you.

yes, the price tag is a handicap but it is a cracking wine. sadly those are wines which i only get to see as samples but i guess that is better than nothing. 

Posted

Ken, do you ever pair port with cigars?  It's a union I find often works surprisingly well.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Deeg said:

Ken, do you ever pair port with cigars?  It's a union I find often works surprisingly well.

completely agree. big fan of that match. it is almost too easy to do. i did have a 47 i was cracking but isolation put it on hold. 

i will have to rectify this asap. 

almost all fortifieds are useful matches. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Nice article. :thumbsup:

Re the metric v imperial cigar measurements, isn't the 47 ring gauge 47/64ths of an inch diameter?

Posted
8 minutes ago, david9985 said:

Nice article. :thumbsup:

Re the metric v imperial cigar measurements, isn't the 47 ring gauge 47/64ths of an inch diameter?

Yes, but in this case I think the 47 that Ken is referring to is a port.

Posted
Just now, JohnS said:

Yes, but in this case I think the 47 that Ken is referring to is a port.

john, correct, but i have also always assumed that 52 or 47 or whatever was the ring gauge in millimetres. had never heard that x/64ths before. 

one learns something every day. 

thanks. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.