Recommended Posts

  • Replies 20.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Not exactly bought recently .... but just found today in my lockers : Trinidad Fundadores EL NOSU ( El Laguito OCT 1998 ) bought in 2006 in Switzerland. Placed inside my lowest locker and to

I haven't posted in here for quite some time and thought that it would be nice to share some vintage cigars that just came in. I like to collect and smoke as many different vitolas de salida as possib

I don’t normally post my purchases but, aside from the Nudies bundles I ordered, the Lanceros will probably be the last cigars I receive for a while. The other two are highlights from my last few orde

Posted
5 hours ago, tigger said:

Picking these up while I still can...

Good call.  Just pulled the trigger on a box from another popular site.  One of the last two they had stocked, and who knows when (if) they'll resurface. 

Posted
13 hours ago, tigger said:

Picking these up while I still can...

Those MSU sticks look a lot neater than my ETP ones from 2017!

Posted
4 hours ago, FrancisK7 said:

Should it be considered odd that they used standard band C on 2014 cigars when standard band C was discontinued in 2013 when they switched to standard band D?

No. When bands are updated the obsolete stock is used up until they are completely deleted.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
On 2/7/2020 at 12:50 PM, FrancisK7 said:

Should it be considered odd that they used standard band C on 2014 cigars when standard band C was discontinued in 2013 when they switched to standard band D?

Just checked the Cigar Aficionado archives.  There are examples of Monte 3 sporting standard band C up until NOV '16.  The first monte 3 shown with standard band D is DIC '16 (not sure why they reviewed two so close together... maybe for the top 25 list?).  Other vitolas are shown with standard band D in 2014 (edmundo for example), so perhaps they had a surplus of standard band C in the small/med RG size and continued to use them until they ran out. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
19 hours ago, JayHabanos said:

C305A884-8193-4257-95FF-664DD70AD9A8.jpg
E11ADF19-CC9D-41D9-AB56-0735B172C20C.jpg
43A3E95F-A687-4DD1-A2FA-F2F830C2BDB0.jpg
Palmas Extra


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They look nice. 

Was thinking of getting some to try-do they resemble any other Hoyo in profile?

 Thanks 

  • Like 1
Posted
They look nice. 
Was thinking of getting some to try-do they resemble any other Hoyo in profile?
 Thanks 

Yeah I would say they are true to the Hoyo marca. Have that light cream, vanilla taste. Pretty good value smoke


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 2/8/2020 at 10:15 PM, The Squiggler said:

Just checked the Cigar Aficionado archives.  There are examples of Monte 3 sporting standard band C up until NOV '16.  The first monte 3 shown with standard band D is DIC '16 (not sure why they reviewed two so close together... maybe for the top 25 list?).  Other vitolas are shown with standard band D in 2014 (edmundo for example), so perhaps they had a surplus of standard band C in the small/med RG size and continued to use them until they ran out. 

Their pics are mostly just for illustration. Don't derive too much specific info from it.

Posted
1 hour ago, Fugu said:

Their pics are mostly just for illustration. Don't derive too much specific info from it.

Yeah, they definitely reuse their photos for subsequent reviews, but I figured they'd update the picture whenever the band changed (since they did it for other Monte vitolas).  I mean... they even went through the trouble of photoshopping this esplendido to give it a nice rosado hue:

322034883_ScreenShot2020-02-09at6_14_42PM.thumb.png.2b38bdd346a33ccbe1061a145bd3a521.png

Posted
1 hour ago, prodigy said:

I know how you feel... these came today4b72ab0f9500ad4bb25ab65cbcaf4627.jpg94fb2216b3e4c470394af67668d4e42b.jpgad741ac74eb306f0b7fa0e02a372414f.jpg319c8de5a1801af367824978d1f6b5b2.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 


 

 

wow I thought myself and my buddy were the only ones that were going through this. image.png.23312aa64e20c054403a9677457b40fd.png

  • Like 2
Posted
36 minutes ago, fitzy said:


 

 

wow I thought myself and my buddy were the only ones that were going through this. image.png.23312aa64e20c054403a9677457b40fd.png

There is some leeway when you consider Wrapper, Construction, Aroma at Cold ALL play a part in the grading.  Wrappers aren't the only thing considered but if you feel there is an issue I've never had a problem querying through the proper channels.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.