Zigatoh Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 I love the coercion argument, early 1700s was it, read one thing read another, two different opinions, pick the one that suits your needs Though as I have done on another forum thread about the same thing, apologies on behalg all the english people to the scottish for what may or may not have happened some 300 odd years ago 1
Pixa Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Interesting. What do you think a "state" is? Why is country sometimes also referred to as a nation-state? Why does the US (and other nations) have a State Department? Why are leaders of a country referred to as heads-of-state? Head of state of UK is david cameron who is also classed as the head of state of Scotland as well. Scotland is not as you refer to a state in your definition (though I am sure rye was meaning more in the american state way) would be the nation state of the Uk. The independence is about Scotland becoming a nation state with its own head of state. Hope that clears it up for you
Pixa Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Well, now I know a tidbit more about it. Like I said I don't know enough to cast a vote! Dont worry neither do most people in the UK 1
Maplepie Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Dont worry neither do most people in the UK outstanding emoticon choice!
Jeremy Festa Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 I would vote to put back Hadrian's wall! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maplepie Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 I would vote to put back Hadrian's wall! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Nah nah. Let the annexation of South Ireland commence!
Zigatoh Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 States, countries, counties, streets, post codes, regions, areas, all just lines on a map. I wouldn't mind independence, the tax haven of my house on my street, where I get what I vote for in a democracy of 1
ptrthgr8 Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Head of state of UK is david cameron who is also classed as the head of state of Scotland as well. Scotland is not as you refer to a state in your definition (though I am sure rye was meaning more in the american state way) would be the nation state of the Uk. The independence is about Scotland becoming a nation state with its own head of state. Hope that clears it up for you No, I understand. My point was that - here in the US at least - too many people think the word "state" is synonymous with "political entity which is subservient to the centralized national gov't." In a true federalist system such as that by which these United States were... well... united... the States retained their sovereignty and only ceded some of their authority to the federal gov't. (And then Lincoln came along and ended federalism for good.) So, my point - again, from a US perspective - was that the people of the American States back in the day thought of their States as being their country. For example, a Virginian was a Virginian, not an "American." A New Yorker was a New Yorker, not an "American." A Pennsylvanian was a Pennsylvanian, not an "American." I certainly don't know for a fact, but if this Scottish independence thing is going to a vote, I suspect that many Scots consider themselves to be Scots, not "UKers" or "British" or whatever. Cheers, ~ Greg ~ 1
ptrthgr8 Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 States, countries, counties, streets, post codes, regions, areas, all just lines on a map. I think I'd have to kindly disagree with you a bit here. Sure, there are lines on a map to delineate property and political units and whatnot, but I think a large part of being a country/state/county is also the shared common cause, history, shared experiences, etc. Call it "community" or whatever you want, but it's certainly more meaningful than a line on a map somewhere. Cheers, ~ Greg ~
Maplepie Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 I think I'd have to kindly disagree with you a bit here. Sure, there are lines on a map to delineate property and political units and whatnot, but I think a large part of being a country/state/county is also the shared common cause, history, shared experiences, etc. Call it "community" or whatever you want, but it's certainly more meaningful than a line on a map somewhere. Cheers, ~ Greg ~ x2. except in certain circumstances like the majority of Afrika or the current situation dividing the middle east. Also in the Netherlands and Belgium with certain houses being in both Holland and Belgium
ptrthgr8 Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 x2. except in certain circumstances like the majority of Afrika or the current situation dividing the middle east. Also in the Netherlands and Belgium with certain houses being in both Holland and Belgium Well, I think in a lot of those circumstances (and I know I'm over-simplifying things when I say this) it's a matter of groups not sharing common cause. I.e. just because a group of Westerners got together after some war, drew a bunch of lines on a map, and then expected all the people in those areas to get along doesn't mean they would. Probably doesn't explain those houses that are in Holland and Belgium at the same time. I'll blame that one a few too many Heinekens and/or Stellas.
Maplepie Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Well, I think in a lot of those circumstances (and I know I'm over-simplifying things when I say this) it's a matter of groups not sharing common cause. I.e. just because a group of Westerners got together after some war, drew a bunch of lines on a map, and then expected all the people in those areas to get along doesn't mean they would. Probably doesn't explain those houses that are in Holland and Belgium at the same time. I'll blame that one a few too many Heinekens and/or Stellas. we agree on the same thing, Greg. I probably would say the same thing you're saying given the opportunity in a face-face conversation. well... except for the heineken/stella thing. there are much better beers available there!! 1
Zigatoh Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Makes it a difficult definition then, at what point do lines on a map become something else?
ptrthgr8 Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Makes it a difficult definition then, at what point do lines on a map become something else? Difficult to answer, I suppose. But I imagine it involves politicians.
Pixa Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Makes it a difficult definition then, at what point do lines on a map become something else? When they are something else when some where has been a sovereign nation by itself for longer than it has been a union then surely they retain the right to dissolve that union when the populace see fit. No? Also the fact that Scottish, welsh and English are recognised as nationality's with defined borders should make this easier as your street/county/city does not really meet this criteria does is?
backslide Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 If the want to be free let em have it! Good or bad freedom > all
Zigatoh Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 When they are something else when some where has been a sovereign nation by itself for longer than it has been a union then surely they retain the right to dissolve that union when the populace see fit. No? Also the fact that Scottish, welsh and English are recognised as nationality's with defined borders should make this easier as your street/county/city does not really meet this criteria does is? But the US states aren't recognised as nationalities so they don't count? And you appear to be applying a definition of worthwhile area for independence that fits your cause, not surprising eh?
ayepatz Posted September 11, 2014 Author Posted September 11, 2014 well... except for the heineken/stella thing. there are much better beers available there!! Indeed there are... I'm in Brushelsh now assha madder of facc......(hic!) 1
El Presidente Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 I trust our Scottish mates are smart enough to work it out for themselves! Democracy in action. Words, print, reasoned arguments for and against, a vote. It is a beautiful thing. 1
SCgarman Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 The only thing I know about Scotland is that they make great whisky there!
DrunkenMonkey Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 Will independence have an effect on the price of whisky? 1
Philski Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 I trust our Scottish mates are smart enough to work it out for themselves! Democracy in action. Words, print, reasoned arguments for and against, a vote. It is a beautiful thing. With respect, I'm not entirely sure that's true. There is a powerful war of words being waged on both sides, and I find it hard to escape the feeling that Salmond is quite an operator who is willing to lead Scotland into a dangerous place, at nearly any cost, in a grab for power. I have personal and completely selfish reasons for hoping for a Yes vote, though.
Pixa Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 But the US states aren't recognised as nationalities so they don't count? And you appear to be applying a definition of worthwhile area for independence that fits your cause, not surprising eh? Feel free to try and set your house up as a separate country just dont be surprised if people start to look at you funny and cross the street. American politics are not allowed so going to give my opinion of that a wide berth as I am sure it would send this thread somewhere in the opposite direction.
Smallclub Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 Will independence have an effect on the price of whisky? I'm glad someone finally asks the right question, the one that really counts! 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now