backslide Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 Welcome to FoH Peter. IMHO you live in one of the most beautiful places on the planet. I long to visit again. Jason Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
backslide Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 Oops didn't realize this was a mega necro bump from years past. Man this is a huge pet peeve of mine. Why do people insist on bumping old a$$ threads? Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
Fugu Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 On 09/06/2016 at 2:10 AM, backslide said: Oops didn't realize this was a mega necro bump from years past. Man this is a huge pet peeve of mine. Why do people insist on bumping old a$$ threads? Because dememihel had a question reg. travelling to Iceland, and obviously this was the best place for him to ask. No big deal. Sometimes it can be of help reading posts before clicking "submit"
backslide Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 Because dememihel had a question reg. travelling to Iceland, and obviously this was the best place for him to ask. No big deal. Sometimes it can be of help reading posts before clicking "submit" He hasn't been active in over 2 years. A post in this thread won't magically make him reappear. Sometimes it can be of help to look at profiles before clicking submit. Also a PM would have been a better option. It all boils down to forum etiquette IMHO. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
Fugu Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 Sorry, no offence mate, but you are a bit niggling here - there is no one else to blame for your own little mishap. 1. Subport (OP) has been last active one hour ago, if you'd check 2. I haven't ever heard anywhere that it's forbidden/unwanted to bump old threads (for whatever reason), according to any forum etiquette. At least his question and bumping appears sound and reasonable. I for one found it quite interesting to learn at this occasion that we even have Icelanders on board (perhaps it's just me, may be). And certainly no need to PM such question, since the requested info could be of interest to other members here, too. That's reason and aim of having a public forum. He could have posted a new thread at the waterhole as well, but certainly no need for it. Absolutely no reason the get worked up about such a banal thread bump, IMHO. Cheers, Paul
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now