Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I'd like to see a semi annual review of the "best of breed" of each size. At the end of the year all the member can vote for their best of breed and the cigars with the most votes wins and gets two review the following year.

For example I'd like to see two reviews next year on:

Lusis

Sir Winston

Monte No. 2

P898

RASS

Des Dieux

PLPC

I think this would be a testament to consistancy (or lackthereof)

Posted

Would really love to see a review of the Monte "A"! Also, a shootout between cigars in tubes versus the non-tubed, like Partagas P2's or R&J Short Churchills for example.

And, as previously mentioned:

Bolivar Royal Coronas

R&J Short Churchills

PLPC's

Thanks!

Posted

I would definitely like to see more reviews on PLPCs as I smoke them quite regularly. I think it would also be neat to see a comparison between all the Siglos (I, II, III, IV, V, VI).

Posted

I think the video reviews should be done on the most consistent cigars around. There's too much variance in Monte no2, no4s, most RyJ , even some Partagas IMO.

Also it would be interesting to see a vertical tasting on PLPC for example.

Posted

Would really love to see a review of the Monte "A"! Also, a shootout between cigars in tubes versus the non-tubed, like Partagas P2's or R&J Short Churchills for example.

+1 for the Monte A and the tubed versions, I always seem to find them better, also:

RyJ Wide churchill

Juan Lopez 2

Monte Open's

San Cristobal Muralla (before they can it)

LGC Inmensos

and Allones Superiores

Posted

Punch Punch as mentioned in another thread

Boli Royal Coroans

Montecristo No.1

Vegas Robainas

Posted

I think it would be amusing to see a review on Guantanamera cigars ... mainly for all the bashing and trash talking that one can only assume would occur.

Posted

Hi Rob,

what would you like to review next?

I would like to see a review of the San Cristobal de la Habana Muralla. I have been smoking some singles lately and have mixed feelings about these and would love to get an experts view on these.

Another cigar I would like to be reviewed is the Juan Lopez Seleccion No. 4.

You were also very high on the Punch Super Robusto from 2006. How is this cigar progressing with age? Same goes for the Ramon Allones Estupendos.

Oh by the way, what happened to the yearly SLR double corona review???

Happy smoking

Lars

Posted

I will add quai d'orsay to my suggestions, after Guy's write up, I am fascinated by these cigars. I think a battle of the cigars would be fun like puttin the top robustos against each other, the top figurados, PC's, corona gorda's, ect...

Posted

I guess, after thinking about it for a bit...

Please review some of the lesser known brands with a lesser market share. Lets face it... most of us are pretty familiar with the flavor profiles of Montecristo, Cohiba, Paragas, etc...

I've never had a Quai d'Orsay, a El Rey del Mundo, a Juan López and so on...

I'm looking to find out if any of their cigars are worth ordering a single or sampler on. (So, if you do a review, please have a few singles available...)

That's my 2 cents. And, with the US Dollar where it is... that's probably worth less than gum on the street...

Thanks for your consideration, and thanks for asking.

Posted

No point reviewing a cigar we're all familiar with right now, I think would be best for a q d'o, superiores and other less common smokes and marques like JL (which isn't exactly a secret but not the usual fair). I'd like to open my eyes to something I didn't know about rather than the usual stuff.

Posted

I'd like to see some reviews of cigars from 2006-2008. Recently, I've primarily been smoking cigars from 2004-2010. The cigars from 04-08 (especially 04-06 right now) seem to be more true to their marca. I have found more similarity in taste among fresh cigars across marcas. We know that recent production cigars certainly are more approachable younger than in the past, but I wonder if that is not such a good thing after all. So, I'd like to hear your thoughts on whether 3-5 years of box age allows recent production cigars to develop more brand-specific characteristics. Or maybe it is all in my head.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.