Because this was going to hound him. Blogs and various media were starting to talk about it, and this would blow up when the draft came. Best to get out in front of this and control the story than have the tabloids control it and hound him. He did not just decide to do this out of the blue for publicity. He is a public figure and has a life and a potential future career to protect.
Is this written in stone somewhere? In a handbook? What makes race "in and of itself" a statement of ones self, but being a man or woman not a statement of self? Or being a male homosexual or a lesbian not a statement of oneself? Or being a musician, or a baseball player not of statement of ones self. I am a lot of things: white, male, formerly overweight (now just slightly ), an aging tennis player, a father... are not all of these things a statement of ones self, "in and of itself" or not... whatever that means?
Incorrect. Phil Robertson did not just say he was against homosexuality. He called gays "homosexual offenders", grouped homosexuality with bestiality, sleeping around (with men or women), idolaters, adulterers, male prostitutes, the greedy, drunkards, slanderers and swindlers. Then he ranted about people, groups and religions not having Jesus in their lives. Who says gays don't have Jesus in their lives? And my religion does not include Jesus... I think my congregation holds an upstanding place, locally, in the US, and globally, and is moral, upstanding, and performs great acts of charity and caring. So no... he really did not just say he does not agree with the homosexual lifestyle.
Time to wake up and smell the coffee. Same sex behavior has been around forever. It has been observed in over 1500 non-human species (well documented in over 500 species), and in humans, the percentage of gays in the population is thought to be anywhere from 5 to 12%, depending on the studies. It has always been and will always be. A biological certainty.
Rick